Anabolic steroids, bodybuilding discussion forums. - Steroidology

rui products
 

(Forum for members to discuss the use of anabolic steroids)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28
  1. #1
    Junior Bodybuilder
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    492
    Rep Power
    11
    short ester cycles
    by hojo33 of bodybuildingforyou.com

    Background:

    I began BBing with a trainer from Germany. In educating me, he related to me that, in his time BBing there, European BBers were relatively without American influence. Common practice called for the use of short half-life ester injectables, the variety of which was much greater than exists today, combined with mild orals like Anavar and Winstrol and, sometimes, Dbol. Short cycles (2-4 weeks) were also the norm. Most interesting, use of test was very uncommon, and considered a horror. What was commonly used was Parabolan, what we, today, call Trenbolone. Eight week cycles were virtually unheard of, and the desire to pack on 20-40 pounds in such a short time was unthinkable. European BBers took a much more unhurried pace of growth. Young, competitive BBers were very much smaller than those found in the US, today, due to this orderly pace of growth. It was only the very rare, genetically unusual BBer who was big at a young age. Europeans simply had a different outlook and different standards.


    IAN: Yes, within 5 months I was using 200 lbs for like 14 reps.

    Early on, my trainer lamented the situation he found in the US: heavy dependence upon test, long halflife esters used in long cycles, gross overeating, poor estrogen suppression, acceptance of high body fat percentages, and excessive lean body mass development in short time spans. He was horrified at what he envisioned would be the long term consequences of widespread use of these practices. He was associated with IFBB pros, like Zhur, el Sonbaty, Schlierkamp, and Ruhl, while in Europe. He was well aware of the health complications associated with extreme muscularity. He kept reiterating "BBing is a sport for life".

    While still a natural, I began to examine how an entire philosophy of Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) use might be developed, based upon the European experience. By the time it was appropriate for me to begin AAS, years later, I already had a plan. Initially, I quietly used myself as a lab rat. The results became quite visible, and, before too long, questions followed. My trainer asked that we work together, to develop a new way for his athletes to grow. And here we are.....

    Characteristics of AAS:
    There are two clearly discernable characteristics of interest to BBers. Anabolic: muscle growth/hypertrophy. and Androgenic: strength, aggression, fat burning. Most Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) possess these two characteristics in varying ratios, and in various strengths. For example, Halotestin may be seen to produce a pure androgenic response, but no anabolic response. Deca, on the other hand, will produce anabolism with no significant androgenic response. Test produces roughly a 50 percent anabolic response, and 50 percent androgenic response. Then there is strength of response. Winstrol is a moderate, pure anabolic. Anavar is a moderate, pure androgen. Trenbolone is a very powerful androgen (80 percent of total response), much more powerful than the androgenic characteristics of test. Tren's anabolic characteristic (20 percent of total response), is weaker than that of test. And so on. I have built a complete table of response characteristics of all the Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) components we use.


    "In a stunning scoop that has shaken bodybuilding to its core, we have convinced six of the current Top 20 professional bodybuilders in the world to reveal every detail of their drug and steroid regimens… What does this mean for you? Every bodybuilder who's ever stepped inside a gym has wondered what it is that separates the guys who lift for years and years (and get big, but not that big)... and the monsters that win the big professional contests. It isn't genetics that accounts for the incredible difference in size... and it isn't training or nutrition…"

    Site injection and localized growth:
    Time and time again, we have seen localized growth response to site injected, esterless and short halflife AAS. I no longer accept that a positive response is anecdotal. It's just too commonplace, in my own work. Consequently, we no longer waste gear in glutes and quads. We identify and then site inject any and all lagging body parts, in a rotating injection program. And we have seen some startling responses. In nearly every case, we prefer tren and an esterless AAS, for the most powerful response. There must be weak-, or non-responders, but I have yet to find any. I owe much, in this particular area, to the work of Paul Borreson.


    The Oxford English dictionary defines the term somatotype as the "The physique of an individual as expressed numerically in terms of the extent to which it exhibits the characteristics of each of three extremes (the endomorph, mesomorph, and ectomorph)." So for example, a person exhibiting extreme mesomorphy might be assigned the numerical cocktail of 2-7-1. What does this mean?

    Cycle design:
    Cycles are assembled by, first, determining the end response characteristics desired, and assembling components whose Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) characteristics interlock together to produce that end response with a minimum of overlap, over the cycle time span desired. Consider this cycle: Nandrolone phenylpropionate (EOD), tren (EOD), Winstrol (ED), optional Anavar (ED). I've remarked, elsewhere, on the desirability of pairing tren with Winstrol. We require the use of a pure androgen for EVERY cycle, to insure ongoing muscle definition, density, and post cycle androgenicity, so Anavar is our choice for this cycle. Here, Tren is our primary androgen, and nandrolone our primary anabolic. All of these agents are selected for their lack of water retention. All are either short acting or esterless, so that meets our requirements for site injection. And, yes, we do site inject it all. We begin by frontloading the estered injectables, up to three days before cycle day zero, and add the orals and esterless injectables at cycle day minus one. On cycle day zero, the Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) is already active, with blood levels increasing. We end the injectables and orals, suitably in advance of the end of the cycle, so that, on cycle day 15, the Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) is non-inhibitory, and HTPA recovery begins immediately. Add on 14 days further system recovery, and then a cycle can begin anew. Seven weeks, total. Over a year, this might be accomplished seven times. When HCG, and an anti-e at suitable dosage, is added to the Clomid, the HTPA may be recovered in only 2 weeks. This shortens the next cycle availability point by one week.

    Yes, it's a lot of injections. And the Winstrol hurts.

    What might be expected, in the way of results? Bulking, we have seen as much as 10 pounds lbm. Average is five pounds. Over a year, that's 35 pounds. You say, "Hell, I can grow that much in 8 weeks". I say, let's see how many times a year you can accomplish that, and over how many years do you think you will continue to accomplish that? We have this steady, measured growing, going on and on. My guess is that this approach, using only a modest bulking diet, rather than the typical American pig-out bulking diet, can be accomplished for years and years. Due to short cycle length and rational diet design, there is very little fat gain. No pressing need to cut. No need to look like the typical big, smooth BBer, who only looks cut once a year. Our people are lean, defined, and feel healthy, all the time. They only spend two weeks cycling, while seven (or six), clean. And, since they get normalized quickly, they can train and grow natural, more quickly, because there is none of the weeks and weeks of getting that slow Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) out of their systems. The BBer doing the typical 8 week long acting ester cycle exists for weeks in a kind of limbo, where the blood levels are not high enough for anabolism, but are still inhibitory, and he must wait all that extra time. My people are off, longer than they are on. Their bodies free of drugs, all that time.



    We tend to avoid test. Not completely; just most of the time. What we found is that, anytime you use test, it magnifies the sides of whatever you use with it. Tren, used in rational dosages, is relatively free of sides, and causes fewer overall sides during cycles. We use tren, like the typical BBer uses test. With tren, you get much more response, with much lower dosages, with greater androgenic intensity. Someone once wrote that tren was "the gear of the gods". Indeed, the Europeans brought to BBing AAS, a very great gift. We do use test, but only for very specialized purposes.




    We only use one type of eight week bulk cycle. That for Boldenone, which now can only be obtained in a very long halflife ester. We are working with a supplier, and are patiently awaiting him to provide us with our first esterless Boldenone. Testing will begin immediately afterwards, to develop new dosage and protocols, following which, we expect to end our use of nandrolone phenylpropionate. Too many of our clients exhibit some degree of bloat from progesterone aromatization, emerging from the nandrolone. We consider any bloat, from any origin, entirely unacceptable, on health and esthetic grounds.

    Body fat gain on cycles:
    Ever notice how productive of muscle a cycle usually is, during the first four weeks, and how it slows down and body fat accumulates during the second four weeks? You end up eating more in the attempt to return things to the former rate. More body fat. Finally, the whole process slows down for good. What's going on? The common explanation is that you are getting bigger, so that requires more nutrition. We say no. We say the body realizes what is going on, it exhausts and compensates, and body metabolism and developmental processes simply will no longer support this process. But you continue to eat. And that food has got no place else to go, but be turned into fat, with unproductive lbm production.


    What's infinitely more interesting than Sheldon's view on somatotype permanency, is his assertion that somatotype and temperament are somehow intertwined. I'll use the example of a mesomorph's temperament because it leads to an amusing corollary involving Arnold Schwarzenegger.

    Our short cycle designs, whether for 2, 3, or 4 weeks features tren, as a foundation, which is a potent fat burner, due to powerful androgenicity, and will not aromatize to estrogen. And a diet, which is clean, and appropriately sized for rational lbm gain, while minimizing conversion to fat. Later, the body is clean of AAS, and primed for most sensitive and effective response, before the cycle begins. The conversion from nutrition to muscle takes place under optimum conditions, at low body fat levels. The Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) ramp-up is swift and full, and the cycle ends before the system can desensitize and cause spillover of nutrition to body fat.

    Estrogen pileup is another cause of body fat accumulation, during the typical 8 week, long halflife ester cycle. I suggest that readers visit the AE zine Issue 46, and download the blood concentration calculator from the excellent article on blood concentration of various halflife esters of AAS. Then, plug in your long halflife ester cycle components, and witness the startling blood level concentrations of what you are injecting, late in the cycle. Using the typical paltry anti-e dosages of the typical BBer, is it any wonder that, late in the cycle, estrogen levels build up out of control, and body fat follows?

    Estrogen and anti-e:
    It is an obsolete belief that estrogen is necessary in any cycle. Indeed, ANY amount of estrogen is BAD in any cycle! There is not one study which supports the notion. But the idea lived on in yet another obsolete notion; that water weight is good weight, in a cycle. That, water introduced into the muscle, causes increased lifts, and by lifting heavier, greater growth is obtained. The experts would purposely advise minimal amounts of anti-estrogen drugs, only to minimize the chance of gyno, but to insure lots of this, supposedly, desirable water weight. On the AE boards, I have witnessed these experts advising NO anti-e's, but only to have some Nolvadex at hand, to deal with gyno, should it appear. Not only do you end up with fake strength and fake muscle size, but, at the same time, the estrogen buildup causes high blood pressure, electrolyte imbalance, and a host of health issues. There is water buildup in the lower back to the extent that posts frequently document BBers in pain, cramps, and difficulty, attempting deads. The champions of this approach say "Oh just take some ibuprofen, and you will be just fine". Try asking your liver what it thinks about that approach. Following the cycle, the water disappears, along with the strength and size it fooled the user into believing was real muscle. This often causes depression, and chases the user into a course of creatine, to re-introduce that fake size and strength. The muscle character appears smooth, and the density is poor. When the BBer diets down, all this is lost, and the truth is seen. It's no wonder that certain other experts advise that BBers never come off AAS, so this scenario may never be exposed for what it is: a rollercoaster of reality versus water weight. I agree with them. It is not healthy to run back and forth between lost size and fullness caused by water weight. But it also is not a good thing to stay on AAS, all the time, either. This is a totally brain dead approach to Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) use. And the BBer who engages in it never attains the quality, defined physique he deserves. It's just a lot of smooth water weight and high body fat.

    And body fat. Everyone should know that the presence of excess estrogen causes fat deposition. The greater and the longer the exposure to elevated levels of estrogen, the greater the body fat accumulation. Endos, listen up; stay away from any situation which creates elevated estrogen levels. Everyone, listen up; it is OBSOLETE cycle technology to enable anything but minimal levels of estrogen, at any time. Estrogen is evil, and it is NOT your friend. Using anti-e's cannot reduce estrogen to levels below which the male body cannot function properly. It requires very little estrogen to function, and no anti-e removes it all.

    What to do? Begin, with an entirely different approach. Say that ANY water weight is BAD weight. That estrogen must be banished, to the fullest rational extent. And that the muscle you grow and see is, in fact, muscle, and not water. That the muscle produced will be dense and well defined. A quality physique. How, then does one obtain that increased strength, which the water provided, to enhance growth during the cycle? As stated, we first kill off the estrogen and bloat. Second, we emphasize the introduction of powerful androgens into the cycle structure. I am speaking, once again, of tren and anavar. Together, these components make you VERY strong. And with NO bloat or estrogen required. The concentrated androgenicity encourages intense, aggressive workouts, while also encouraging fat burning. It is very commonplace to observe body recompositions during such cycles. In other words, you get big and lose body fat, simultaneously. The androgenicity also produces significantly increased muscle density and definition. At cycle end, what you end up with, is the real deal. Solid muscle, growth, and increased definition. No need to rush to the nearest container of creatine to stem your losses. And that strength is yours, to keep. And no test.....

    Now, go back to that blood concentration calculator, and compare the blood concentrations of the typical 75 mg EOD of tren, to what you were subjecting yourself to, with that long halflife ester cycle. No stress caused by estrogen pileup, either. Now, you tell me which alternative is better.

    What do we use to suppress estrogen? Well, we formerly used Arimidex. Arimidex is now an antique for us. We use Femara. We prefer one 2.5 mg tab ED. Our clients are kept dry as a bone. We will begin to study Aromasin, in mid-September. Aromasin utilizes a different approach to Estrogen control, which promises to be even more powerful than Femara. But research indicates that IGF-1 production is not suppressed by Femara, but may, in fact, be enhanced by it. We do not see that with Aromasin. Time and experimentation will tell.

    Most importantly, we keep our people on anti-e, post cycle, during the HTPA recovery process, and later. This both speeds recovery of the HTPA, as well as minimizing fat buildup, while hormone levels fluctuate wildly.

    Androgenicity and quality:
    BBers commonly justify their long cycles by saying that they need the long cycle to enable "consolidation". They observe that this effect only occurs late in the cycle. Why is this? It's because the androgen level of the Sustanon test, typically used, takes that long to pile up and affect the muscularity of the BBer. But what about Trenbolone? Almost without fail, users commonly report density and hardening to appear within a few weeks. Why is this? Because the androgenic response of tren is so much more powerful than that of test. You can get this response to produce quality muscle at dosages of only 75 mg EOD, in less than a month. In a Sustanon test, it takes many weeks to accumulate an immense blood concentration, to achieve the same result. It is commonplace to observe tren users burning fat, while they cycle. Sustanon (sust) users never report this effect. Why? Once again, the androgenic response of tren is so much greater than that of test. Intense androgenicity induces fat burning. If Anavar is added, the androgenicity effect is intensified, still further.

    Ever hear of the term "muscle maturity"? It describes muscle which is dense and defined. The commonly accepted belief is that it takes years and years to acquire this muscle characteristic. But why? Because, using test, the exposure to the muscle hardening androgenicity only occurs for about two weeks in the typical long cycle. And that cycle can only be repeated a few times a year. In the tren/anavar-based short cycle, the exposure to muscle hardening androgenicity occurs for longer periods, and the cycle can be repeated many times a year. "Muscle maturity", and quality, appears with rapidity, and not with years and years. I see muscle quality in only one year of regular short cycling, which I never see in the typical long cycle BBer, unless it occurs for years. Which would you prefer?

    The issue of health:
    There are those who say the typical American method of cycling, using long acting ester cycles, for 8 weeks or more, and eating 7-8000 calories per day, for all that time, is no danger to health. To that, I say this: in the millions of years of human evolution, at no time, ever, has the male of our species been exposed to the barrage of hormonal, *********, and developmental pressure and manipulation, as occurs during the long acting ester eight week cycle. Do you really believe our bodies were engineered and evolved to deal with this attack, as well as the stress of being forced to add 20-40 pounds of lbm and body fat in this same time span, over and over, again? Don't be a fool. If you believe so, then you are whistling past the cemetery. And there are additional fools, who would have you believe that staying on this course, continuously, can do you no harm. There is currently an unprecedented, uncontrolled lab experiment, taking place all over the world, with thousands of men as lab rats. The long term outcome cannot be predicted by anyone, today. True, every single one of us will die, someday. My people and I have no intention of hastening the arrival of that inevitable day, just to look big in a coffin, as we are laid to our eternal rest. What the hell is YOUR hurry? And, what if you don't die? What if you are forced to leave your beloved sport, and spend the rest of your days, living with hypertension and heart damage due to tachycardia? And kidney damage caused by the hypertension. And still other health issue possibilities. Is this any way to live? It's a personal value judgment and risk assessment process. Step back for a moment, and re-evaluate your position and priorities.

    The end game:
    One other matter, which few consider. Everyone has a genetically pre-programmed maximum of lbm, which their body will support, regardless of whether you reach it via AAS. The faster you approach it, the sooner your gains will decline, no matter how much juice you cycle, and how often you cycle it. You will end up spending money, juicing larger quantities of gear, and stressing your body, for diminishing returns. Finally, you are tapped out. All the slin, growth hormone, IGF-1, and whatever else you toss at it, will never get you past that limit. In a minority of individuals, they will attain immense lbm gains, over time. The rest of us, face the remainder of our BBing careers, re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. All we accomplish is staying right where we are, until we leave the sport in frustration.

    BBing is a sport for life. Why exhaust yourself and your body, in a hurry to arrive at the end of the journey, earlier than you need to? I'm 48 years old, and I look forward to growing and growing, for as long as I remain in the sport. We have a 65 year old client, who last competed 11 years ago. We did a few short cycles with him, dieted and prepped him, and he walked away with a second prize trophy, healthy and happy. Have any of you ever considered that you might still be able to lift and compete at that age? You better forget it, if all you can think of is slamming on endless pounds, today and tomorrow. Your time in BBing will either end in poor health, or the frustration of having reached your limit, and going no further.

    Summary:
    I have presented, above, only the most basic introduction to my philosophy and approach to short cycling, and offered only a simple example out of a program which I spent years developing. I have devised an entire series of special-purpose cycles, each of which embody most, if not all, of the above principles.

    The purpose of the short cycle is to employ moderate dosages of short halflife ester and esterless injectable and oral AAS, combined with moderate and healthy diet, to promote moderate stress anabolic growth, over time. This same process results in very high quality muscle production, which only increases with each cycle, and minimal health impact. It assumes a long term outlook. It is intended for the mature and rational BBer, who expects to remain in the sport for the rest of his life. If you truly love BBing, you never want to leave, and you want to keep your interest and grow, then consider how the short cycle might be what you need for your future in our beloved sport.

    Finally:
    I want to take the time to publicly thank my very special friends and clients, who put their faith in me, and assisted me by using my protocols. Through their invaluable feedback and experience, they enabled me to refine and perfect my overall program. Without them, this all would be nothing but theory. Some are former and present members of this fine board.

    And thank you, for taking the time to read all these words. I hope they help you in your journey, as BBers.

    Now, let the discussion begin!!.....

  2. #2
    Administrator
    Site Manager
    StoneColdNTO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    23,566
    Rep Power
    2000
    A very interesting, thought provoking article.

    Thanks for posting it........
    Stone Cold..............................Never Too Old



    Disclaimer: Steroidology.com does not promote the use of anabolic steroids without a doctor's prescription. The information we share is for entertainment purposes only.

  3. #3
    Administrator
    Site Manager
    StoneColdNTO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    23,566
    Rep Power
    2000
    Back up top....^^^^

    Come on guys, it's a long article, but definitely worth the read.........
    Stone Cold..............................Never Too Old



    Disclaimer: Steroidology.com does not promote the use of anabolic steroids without a doctor's prescription. The information we share is for entertainment purposes only.

  4. #4
    Amateur Bodybuilder Rocket Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dirty South!!!
    Posts
    522
    Rep Power
    11
    Indeed something to think about....

  5. #5
    Novice
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    67
    Rep Power
    12
    This was written by Muscletrainee from Anabolic Extreme.

  6. #6
    Community Veteran
    Ich will, daß ihr mich versteht

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    145
    Rep Power
    11
    3 weeks on, 3 weeks off, 3weeks on, 12 weeks off is how the olympic lifters tough to me 20 years ago. The dbol (nerobol) back then was out of this world.....no comparism to today's crap

  7. #7
    Administrator
    Site Manager
    StoneColdNTO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    23,566
    Rep Power
    2000
    Originally posted by Mr. Nobody
    3 weeks on, 3 weeks off, 3weeks on, 12 weeks off is how the olympic lifters tough to me 20 years ago. The dbol (nerobol) back then was out of this world.....no comparism to today's crap

    Do you still use some variation of short cycles ??
    Stone Cold..............................Never Too Old



    Disclaimer: Steroidology.com does not promote the use of anabolic steroids without a doctor's prescription. The information we share is for entertainment purposes only.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Bimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,126
    Rep Power
    11
    How good are the gains from that quality wise?

  9. #9
    Almost Natural Batman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Gotham City
    Posts
    892
    Rep Power
    12
    I'm planning something similar for a "cycle of 3 cycles" starting next april. The routine will be 2 weeks on, 4 weeks off, using tren, Winstrol (winny) and some propionate the first week of every cycle to stimulate a very anabolic environment. I already tried the two week short ester cycles thing, and it seemed to work.

  10. #10
    Experienced bodybuilder gymlion77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    843
    Rep Power
    12
    great article this needs to be a sticky!!!

  11. #11
    Community Veteran
    Ich will, daß ihr mich versteht

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    145
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by StoneColdNTO
    Do you still use some variation of short cycles ??
    only within my HRT (Androgel). With HRT I dont worry about recovery so much and just go until I feel like coming off (and I found that shorter intervalls are more fun). But I also dont use huge amounts either -for the same reason- I dont need to worry about getting the maximum out of the time I am on cycle (suppressed). Sometimes, I just pump it up a little for a week or even just a couple of days.......again this is what works for me NOW....
    Last edited by Mr. Nobody; 02-12-2004 at 12:26 PM.

  12. #12
    Pro Bodybuilder Vennom96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,388
    Rep Power
    11
    Wow, Interesting article. So what are people supposed to do that wanna follow this? Get anavar, tren, winstrol, and Nandrolone phenylpropionate and then follow the 2 week on, 5 week off cycle?? I don't know if I could inject myself 3-5x a week!

  13. #13
    Junior Bodybuilder
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    492
    Rep Power
    11
    Vennom- how many cycles have you done? I ask you this b/c i felt the same way until my 3rd cycle. By that time i couldnt wait to shoot up. I am currently injecting EOD and on the off days i can't wait for the next. the cycle before this one i shot myself ED and i still loved it. It's not as hard as you think, i enjoy it. Some people might say i am nuts for loving to sick needles in myself, I say i am gettin one step closer to being the biggest and the best!

  14. #14
    Pro Bodybuilder Vennom96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,388
    Rep Power
    11
    RonZoid: I'm on the 2nd week of my first cycle. I'm doing 400mg of Sustanon. I inject every Mon and Thurs. I've stuck myself in the ass 2x so far and in the quad once. Whenever I inject in my ass, it is realy sore for the next 3-4 days and it hurts to put any pressure on that cheek! Is that normal? And I had a bad experience w/ the quad shot so I don't like doing them. I went though a vein and when I pulled the needle out, blood came spurting out and it kinda freaked me out.

  15. #15
    Administrator
    Site Manager
    StoneColdNTO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    23,566
    Rep Power
    2000
    BUMP....^^^^
    Stone Cold..............................Never Too Old



    Disclaimer: Steroidology.com does not promote the use of anabolic steroids without a doctor's prescription. The information we share is for entertainment purposes only.

  16. #16
    30 YEARS AAS EXPERIENCE Deepglute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Münsterland
    Posts
    792
    Rep Power
    14
    Does anyone know who makes an esterless EQ? I am not asking for a source, only the name of a lab.

    Thanks

  17. #17
    Junior Bodybuilder
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    228
    Rep Power
    12
    Originally posted by Vennom96
    RonZoid: I'm on the 2nd week of my first cycle. I'm doing 400mg of Sustanon. I inject every Mon and Thurs. I've stuck myself in the ass 2x so far and in the quad once. Whenever I inject in my ass, it is realy sore for the next 3-4 days and it hurts to put any pressure on that cheek! Is that normal? And I had a bad experience w/ the quad shot so I don't like doing them. I went though a vein and when I pulled the needle out, blood came spurting out and it kinda freaked me out.
    Sustanon is unusally like that. It tends to hurt alot, even one mL hurts sometimes, depending no how sensitive you are, and ALOT of guys are sensitive. Omnadren doesnt have this problem though, for some reason. It is essentially the same thing as Sust, but cheaper and painfree. If you dont like the pain from sust, you may not like pure prop either.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Bimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,126
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by RonZoid12
    Vennom- how many cycles have you done? I ask you this b/c i felt the same way until my 3rd cycle. By that time i couldnt wait to shoot up. I am currently injecting EOD and on the off days i can't wait for the next. the cycle before this one i shot myself ED and i still loved it. It's not as hard as you think, i enjoy it. Some people might say i am nuts for loving to sick needles in myself, I say i am gettin one step closer to being the biggest and the best!
    I have only done one cycle and feel the same way about. I am looking foward to including some tren ED for my next one.

  19. #19
    MDC
    MDC is offline
    Novice
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    41
    Rep Power
    11
    I only use short acting ester since my first cycle was long acting, I did not like the bloat then crash I had. Just Tren, Prop/susp, and Winstrol (winny) for me and loving every inject.

  20. #20
    30 YEARS AAS EXPERIENCE Deepglute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Münsterland
    Posts
    792
    Rep Power
    14
    Bump

  21. #21
    Musclesci.com Budlite74's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Cali *The West Is The Best*
    Posts
    327
    Rep Power
    12
    good read

  22. #22
    Junior Bodybuilder
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    492
    Rep Power
    11
    Vennom- try injecting the sust slower. Ever since i started injecting 1cc about every min the pain from injections has been almost non-existant.

  23. #23
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1
    Rep Power
    0
    I know I'm digging this thread up from the grave, but...

    I'm curious to read more from whoever was the original author of this thread. I've been looking around on some different boards, but haven't found it yet. Anyone know?

  24. #24
    Senior Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    enroute VA
    Posts
    10,248
    Rep Power
    50
    very interesting...these articles are really helping in my decision for a short cycle.

  25. #25
    Junior Bodybuilder
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    178
    Rep Power
    9
    good articale!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
  1. By MethTest in forum Anabolic Steroid Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-16-2013, 03:58 PM
  2. By LAWNSAVER in forum Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding Articles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-14-2012, 11:47 AM
  3. By Spynes in forum Anabolic Steroid Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-10-2007, 04:48 PM
  4. By Jimmykick in forum Anabolic Steroid Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-23-2006, 06:03 PM
  5. By JohnnyB in forum Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding Articles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-04-2004, 06:34 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  

3Js Nutrition Network

juicepump







solid muscle isolate 5lb





3Js Nutrition Network



health and fitness talk