Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Champ
Putting things on paper and real life experience are two different things. I like sust and know many others who do, to say that it is inferior is a pretty bold statement based only on a graph on paper.
Take andriol for example. On paper it looks like a very potent steroid but ask anyone who has tried it, and they will say it is complete shit and a waste of money.
My advice to anyone is to find 2 or 3 drugs that you personally like and stick with what works for you. Just because the guy down the street gets better gains from 500mg cyp than he does 500mg sust does not necessarily mean that you will.
I have tried many compounds and like prop/tren/anavar. And from now on that is what I will use as I know what to expect and love the results.
Champ
|
AND PRETTY MUCH EVERYONE TRAINS DIFFERENTLY..I WOULD LIKE TO SEE A STUDY WHERE 2 GUYS RUN 2 DIFFERENT TEST BLENDS, AND TRAIN IDENTICALLY....THE ONLY FACTOR YOU MAY HAVE IS GENETICS THEN...GIVING THAT THEY FOLLOW THE SAME DIET ETC...
E
__________________
"Why do we lift weights?"
"We lift weights to increase physical strength and muscle size"
"No other answer is correct."
"We do not lift weights to improve endurance,reduce body fat levels, improve flexibility or gain agility."
Those particular physical attributes are improved through cardiovascular training, diet, stretching and ballistic activities"
-Ed Coan
|